Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.46 seconds)
M/S. Le Meridien vs M/S. Thomas Cook India Ltd. 2000(6) on 2 May, 2008 cites

Kartik Ramachandran R. vs P.O., Labour Court And Anr. on 19 October, 2005

management did not aver anything with regard to the nature of duties assigned and which the claimant used to perform during the course of his employment till the date he was removed from the services. However, the management was not required to plead evidence in that regard in its written statement. As already discussed above, in the light of the law laid down by our own Hon'ble High Court in R. Kartik Ramchandran Vs. P.O. Labour Court and another (supra), A.K. Patel and etc.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - G Mittal - Full Document

Bennett Coleman And Co. Limited vs Shri Yadeshwar Kumar on 6 October, 2006

22. As laid down by our own Hon'ble High Court in Bennett Coleman and Co. Limited Vs. Yadeshwar Kumar (supra) a person can be called a Supervisor if he is entrusted with the job of supervising other workmen who work under him. It is not necessary that a supervisor has to be top cadre management person. A Supervisor may occupy a lower position in the organization chart of the company.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 13 - S N Dhingra - Full Document

Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing ... vs R.A. Bidoo And Another on 19 June, 1989

management did not aver anything with regard to the nature of duties assigned and which the claimant used to perform during the course of his employment till the date he was removed from the services. However, the management was not required to plead evidence in that regard in its written statement. As already discussed above, in the light of the law laid down by our own Hon'ble High Court in R. Kartik Ramchandran Vs. P.O. Labour Court and another (supra), A.K. Patel and etc.
Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 44 - Full Document

Mukesh K. Tripathi vs Sr. Divn. Manager, L.I.C. & Ors on 6 September, 2004

Vs. The Indian Hotels Co. Ltd. (supra) by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers' Association (supra) and in Mukesh K. Tripathi Vs. Sr. Divisional Manager, L.I.C. And others (supra), initial burden is on the claimant to plead and prove that he is a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 134 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Indian Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. & Another vs Their Workmen(And Connected Appeals) on 15 October, 1957

Vs. The Indian Hotels Co. Ltd. (supra) by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers' Association (supra) and in Mukesh K. Tripathi Vs. Sr. Divisional Manager, L.I.C. And others (supra), initial burden is on the claimant to plead and prove that he is a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 228 - S K Das - Full Document

Mukand Ltd vs Mukand Staff & Officers Association on 10 March, 2004

Vs. The Indian Hotels Co. Ltd. (supra) by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers' Association (supra) and in Mukesh K. Tripathi Vs. Sr. Divisional Manager, L.I.C. And others (supra), initial burden is on the claimant to plead and prove that he is a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 89 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document
1   2 Next