Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.29 seconds)
State vs S Hariharan on 9 April, 2025 cites

Sunil Tyagi vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 28 June, 2021

9) It is stated by Ld. LAC for accused that accused is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further stated by Ld. LAC for accused that procedure of law has not been properly complied by the process server while executing the process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. and there is procedural lapse in the same as it is not in compliance with the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in ________________________________________________________________________________ State Vs. S. Hariharan FIR No. 345/2024 PS. Preet Vihar Page No. 5 of 9 U/s. 174A IPC Digitally signed by Cr. Case No. 111/2025 MAYANK MAYANK GOEL GOEL Date: 2025.04.09 15:26:15 +0530 Sunil Tyagi Vs NCT of Delhi AIRONLINE 2021 DEL 912 . It is further stated by Ld. LAC for the accused that no investigation has been conducted by the IO in the present matter.
Delhi High Court Cites 101 - Cited by 42 - J R Midha - Full Document

Devendra Singh Negi Alias Debu vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 18 March, 1993

13) In Devender Singh Negi @ Debu Vs. State of UP, 1994 Cri LJ 1783, the Allahabad High Court has observed that the words "has absconded or is concealing himself so that such warrant cannot be executed" in section 82 of the code are significant. Every person who is not immediately available cannot be characterized as an absconder. It has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused has absconded or is concealing in order to avoid execution of the warrant. The provisions of section 82 of the Code or mandatory and are to be construed strictly.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 53 - Full Document
1   2 Next