Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.40 seconds)

Union Of India vs V. Sriharan @ ,Murugan & Ors on 2 December, 2015

In Union of India v. V. Sriharan alias Murugan and Others4, a Constitution Bench of this Court by majority reaffirmed the alternative option as laid down in Swamy Shraddananda (2)3 restricting the principle to be applied only by the Constitutional Courts, the Supreme Court and the High Courts. While upholding the principle of alternative sentencing, it was also held that this would not affect the power conferred under Articles 72 & 161 of the Constitution of India. It is on the same principle that we say, the Sessions Court is not competent to interfere with or curtail the effect of the provisions of the Cr.PC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 197 - Cited by 342 - H L Dattu - Full Document

Swamy Shraddananda@Murali Monahar ... vs State Of Karnataka on 22 July, 2008

10. The learned counsel for the appellant relied on the decision in Navas Alias Mulanavas v. State of Kerala2 in which the principle under Swamy Shraddananda (2) v. State of Karnataka3 was employed to confirm the sentence imposed by the High Court of a life sentence without remission but modifying the period of 30 years imprisonment to that of a period of 25 years of imprisonment without remission.
Supreme Court of India Cites 52 - Cited by 270 - A Alam - Full Document
1   2 Next