Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.63 seconds)
M/S. Six Dee Telecom Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs Central Board Of Trustees E.P.F. ... on 15 May, 2018
cites
Jai Balaji Security Services (Regd.) vs A.P.F.C.Delhi (North) on 16 December, 2015
3. A Division Bench of this court in Jai Balaji Security Services
(Regd.) Vs. A.P.F.C. Delhi (North) in LPA No. 880/2015
decided on 16.12.2015 has dealt with the scope of power of the
Tribunal to grant interim relief during pendency of the appeal.
Para 15 and 19 of the judgment read as under:-
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Arcot Textile Mills Ltd vs Reg. Provident Fund Commissioner & Ors on 18 October, 2013
5. On a close scrutiny of the impugned order of the Tribunal, it
appears that the Tribunal has directed the petitioner to deposit
the amount as assessed under Section 7-Q of the EPF Act under
a wrong impression that the part of the order under Section 7-Q
of the EPF Act is not appealable whereas it is a composite order
under Section 14B and 7Q of the EPF Act and hence appealable
in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in Arcot Textile
Mills Limited (supra). Therefore, the impugned order dated
01.06.2015 of the Tribunal is hereby set aside with the direction
that the Tribunal shall decide the request of the petitioner for
interim relief afresh on such terms and conditions as it may
deem fit during the pendency of the appeal.
Section 7Q in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 14B in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1