Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)Section 511 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
T.B. Ramchandra Rao vs A.N.S. Ramchandra Rao on 31 January, 1922
8. As to the value of expert evidence on disputed handwriting their Lordships of the Supreme Court have in Ramchandra v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (S) AIR 1957 S. C. 381 observed that it is not safe to treat expert evidence as to handwriting as sufficient basis for conviction. Their Lordships, however, have added that such evidence may be relied upon along with other various items of external and internal evidence relating to the disputed documents.
Parsad Mahto And Ors. vs Musammat Jasoda Koer on 12 February, 1937
It has been held in Parsad Mahto v. Mt. Jasoda Koer, AIR 1937 Patna, 328 that where a case against a person depends upon a comparison of the handwriting the Court is competent to use its own eyes for the purpose of deciding whether certain handwritings placed before it are similar or not. In a matter of this kind, the Court cannot certainly act like an automaton accepting without scrutiny an expert's opinion as infallible.
1