Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)Yash Pal Marwaha vs Pushpa Builders Ltd. And Anr. on 5 September, 2005
In "Yash Pal Marwaha vs. Pushpa Builders Ltd. & Anr." (supra), , the matter related to the delivery of possession of the flat and not of agricultural land.
Pranav Mittal vs M/S. Dynamic Infradevelopers (P) Ltd. & ... on 27 February, 2017
The order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Indian in "Bunga Danial Babu versus M/s Sri Vasudeva Constructions & Ors." (supra), deals with agreement entered between the parties for the construction of a building and sharing of a certain number of flats. It was held by the Hon'ble Court that a land owner who provided his land to a builder for the construction of a multi-storey building and as per the agreement was entitled to get a certain number of flats in the said building, falls under the definition of consumer. It is evident therefore, that the case law cited by the learned counsel for the appellant deals with the activity of housing construction, and such activity falls within the definition of 'service' under section 2(O) of the Act. However, the facts of the present case are entirely different because no such activity of housing construction is involved in the matter. It is evident, therefore, that despite affording an opportunity, the learned counsel has not been able to produce any case law, depending on which, it could be stated that the facts of the present case indicate that the complainant comes under the definition of 'consumer'.
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
1