Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)The Central Excise Act, 1944
THE FINANCE ACT, 2021
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
Section 72 in The Finance Act, 2018 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 3 in Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Brahma Datt Sharma And Anr on 25 February, 1987
Learned counsel relies upon the judgment of the Hon‟ble
Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahm Datt Sharma
and another [(1987)2 SCC 179] to the effect that by filing a
miscellaneous application in a decided writ petition proceedings
could not be revived in respect of events taken place after long
lapse.
K.A. Ansari & Anr vs Indian Airlines Ltd on 28 November, 2008
there is no occasion to hold back. The binding effect of the
directions cannot be held to have been nullified merely because
of retrospective amendment by the Finance Act, 2011. It was
further submitted that a clarificatory direction could be issued by
learned Single Judge even after the writ petition was decided
and order dated 29.6.2010 thus was fully justified. The view taken
in Brahm Datt Sharma was distinguishable on the principle laid
down in subsequent judgment in K.A.Ansari and another v. Indian
Airlines Limited [(2009)2 SCC 164].