Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)State Of Rajasthan & Ors vs Pareshar Soni on 20 November, 2007
Dr. Manish Singhvi, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing
for the State of Rajasthan submitted that the High court has committed an
error in taking the view that the issue raised stood covered by the
judgment of this Court in Pareshar Soni’s case (supra). Learned counsel
pointed out that this Court was dealing with the un-amended Section 173-A
of the Act in that case, but, so far as the present appeals are concerned,
applications have to be considered by the amended Section 173-A read with
2000 Rules.
Mewa Ram vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 11 August, 2006
In the meanwhile another Writ Petition No.879 of
2003 was also filed by one Mewa Ram challenging the vires of the amended
Section 173-A. The Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court vide its
judgment in Mewa Ram v. State of Rajasthan reported in 2007 (1) WLC (Raj)
1, was pleased to upheld the vires of Section 173-A as inserted by Act No.
19 of 1999. Following that judgment, the Division Bench of the Rajasthan
High Court, on 28.11.2007, remanded the matter to the learned single Judge
to decide whether the writ petition be entertained or not. The case was
later registered as D.B.C. Writ Petition No.430 of 2008.
Section 297 in Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
The Amending Act, 1897
1