Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)
Ajmer Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh ... vs Acit, Ajmer on 19 May, 2017 cites

Raj Kumari Bafna, Beawar vs Ito, Beawar on 14 December, 2016

4. Now the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT. Ld. AR of the assessee has reiterated the submissions as made in the written submissions. He submitted that default was not deliberate, there was certain technical aspects which resulted into delay of uploading the requisite audit report. He submitted. Ld. Counsel submitted that technical snag as occurred in uploading of audit report on web was beyond the control of the assessee. He submitted that under the identical facts, the penalty was deleted by the Tribunal. He placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Jaipur ITAT rendered in the case of Raj Kumari Bafna Vs. ITO in ITA No. 837/JP/2016 order dated 14/12/2016, Rajendra Kumar Shah Vs ITO in ITA No. 944/JP/2016 order dated 27/12/2016 and Shri Govind Garg Vs ITO in ITA No. 781/JP/2016 order dated 31/01/2017.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Rajendra Kumar Shah, Jaipur vs Ito, Jaipur on 27 December, 2016

4. Now the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT. Ld. AR of the assessee has reiterated the submissions as made in the written submissions. He submitted that default was not deliberate, there was certain technical aspects which resulted into delay of uploading the requisite audit report. He submitted. Ld. Counsel submitted that technical snag as occurred in uploading of audit report on web was beyond the control of the assessee. He submitted that under the identical facts, the penalty was deleted by the Tribunal. He placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Jaipur ITAT rendered in the case of Raj Kumari Bafna Vs. ITO in ITA No. 837/JP/2016 order dated 14/12/2016, Rajendra Kumar Shah Vs ITO in ITA No. 944/JP/2016 order dated 27/12/2016 and Shri Govind Garg Vs ITO in ITA No. 781/JP/2016 order dated 31/01/2017.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Govind Garg , Kekri vs Ito, Ajmer on 31 January, 2017

4. Now the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT. Ld. AR of the assessee has reiterated the submissions as made in the written submissions. He submitted that default was not deliberate, there was certain technical aspects which resulted into delay of uploading the requisite audit report. He submitted. Ld. Counsel submitted that technical snag as occurred in uploading of audit report on web was beyond the control of the assessee. He submitted that under the identical facts, the penalty was deleted by the Tribunal. He placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Jaipur ITAT rendered in the case of Raj Kumari Bafna Vs. ITO in ITA No. 837/JP/2016 order dated 14/12/2016, Rajendra Kumar Shah Vs ITO in ITA No. 944/JP/2016 order dated 27/12/2016 and Shri Govind Garg Vs ITO in ITA No. 781/JP/2016 order dated 31/01/2017.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1