Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.76 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 447 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 96 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 141 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Munshi Ram And Others vs Delhi Administration on 27 November, 1967
It was then submitted by Mr. Balakrishnan that the
appellants could have taken recourse to move the authorities, in the
facts and circumstances of the case. His submission is that they
did not at all have the right of private defence. This submission
must be rejected in view of the clear finding recorded by the High
Court that the appellants had acted in exercise of their right of
private defence, but exceeded that right. Unfortunately the High
Court did not consider which of the appellants, if any, exceeded
the right of private defence. Moreover the right of private defence
must be liberally construed. It was observed in Munshi Ram vs.
Delhi Administration (supra) :