Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)Section 18 in Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 [Entire Act]
Santosh Kumar Singh vs The State Of U.P. & Ors. Etc on 12 December, 1995
In Santosh Kumar Singh (supra) the Full Bench was considering the following questions:-
C/M Gandhi Inter College And Another vs Regional Deputy Director Of Education ... on 9 December, 2015
It was incumbent and obligatory on the part of the management or the petitioners to disclose before this Court, the procedure that has been adhered in making the appointment. More so any appointment under Section 16E of the Intermediate Education Act, 1921 would automatically be cancelled after the end of the session. As such the petitioner cannot claim right to continue after the end of the session. Similar view has also been taken by the Division Bench of this Court in its decision dated 09.12.2015 passed in Special Appeal No.871 of 2015 (C/M Gandhi Inter College & Anr. v. Regional Deputy Director of Education & Ors.).
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 16 in Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 [Entire Act]
Subhash Chandra vs State Of U P And 2 Others on 12 July, 2019
(d) The judgment of the Division Bench in Subhash Chandra Tripathi (supra) is affirmed as laying down a correct interpretation of the judgment in A A Calton."
1