Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)The Urban land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999
State Of U.P vs Hari Ram on 11 March, 2013
23. As far as reliance placed on the case of Hari Ram (supra) is
concerned, we are of the clear opinion that the learned Single
Judge was right in distinguishing the said judgment as it is not a
case before us where no notice under Section 10(5) of the Act was
issued to the land owner. On the contrary, it is admitted position
that such notice was given to the land owner on 4.6.1988.
State Of Assam & Ors vs Bhaskar Jyoti Sarma & Ors on 27 November, 2014
The
later judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court fully explained the
purport of the decision in the case of Hari Ram (supra) in the case
of Bhaskar Jyoti Sarma (supra) where even Section 10(5) notice
was not given and still taking over the possession was held as
valid, as quoted in extenso by the learned Single Judge and that in
our respectful understanding, clinches the issue in favour of the
State.
Section 4 in The Urban land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in Cantonments Act, 1924 [Entire Act]
1