Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.46 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
The Specific Relief Act, 1963
M.P. Steel Corporation vs Commnr. Of Central Excise on 23 April, 2015
35. ...the principle of Section 14 would apply not merely in condoning delay
within the outer period prescribed for condonation but would apply de hors
such period for the reason pointed out in Consolidated Engineering above,
being the difference between exclusion of a certain period altogether
under Section 14 principles and condoning delay. As has been pointed out
in the said judgment, when a certain period is excluded by applying the
principles contained in Section 14, there is no delay to be attributed to the
appellant and the limitation period provided by the concerned statute continues
to be the stated period and not more than the stated period. We conclude,
therefore, that the principle of Section 14 which is a principle based on
advancing the cause of justice would certainly apply to exclude time taken in
prosecuting proceedings which are bona fide and with due diligence pursued,
which ultimately end without a decision on the merits of the case.
M R Gupta And Ors vs Luxmi Cooperative Group Housing ... on 20 September, 2022
In M.R.Gupta and Others v. Luxmi Co-operative Group Housing
Society Limited and Others (cited supra), the Punjab and Haryana High Court,
while considering whether the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred in view
of Section 102 read with Section 128 of the Haryana Co-operative Societies Act
(22 of 1984) observed that nothing was stated in Section 128 of the Act that
jurisdiction of Civil Court will be barred, if suit is filed where plea of fraud is
taken.
V.Shrvan Kumar vs Lt.Col.S.B.Sharma on 13 October, 2023
22. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh in V.Shravan Kumar v, Lt.
Col.S.B.Sharma (cited supra), while considering the scope of Section 61 of the
AP Co-operative Societies Act, 1964, held that a dispute relating to specific
performance of contract in respect of an immovable property cannot be termed
as a dispute falling within the purview of Section 61(1).
M/S. Sri Rama Chanra Par Boiled Modern ... vs The State Of A.P. Another on 25 July, 2018
In M/s.Laxmi Srinivasa R and P Boiled Rice Mill v. State of Andhra
Pradesh and Another (cited supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court held that Section
14 is applicable even for the time period spent in filing the Writ Petition.