Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)Section 6 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Pradeep Oil Corporation vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & Anr on 6 April, 2011
(Please also see
Pradeep Oil Corporation v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and another):
Krishna Ram Mahale (Dead), By His Lrs. vs Mrs. Shobha Venkat Rao on 9 August, 1989
It was so held by the
Supreme Court in Yashwant Singh v. Jagdish Singh, AIR 1968
SC 620, Krishna Ram Mohale v. Mrs. Shobha Venkata Rao,
1989(4) SCC 131 (136) : (AIR 1983 SC 2097), Ram Rattan v.
State of U.P., 1977 (1) SCC 188 : (AIR 1977 SC 619) and State of
U.P.v. Maharaja Dharmender Prasad Singh, 1989 (2) SCC 505
(516-517) : (AIR 1989 SC 997).
K.K. Verma And Anr. vs Union Of India And Anr. on 19 January, 1954
The leading decision quoted
in these rulings is the decision of the Bombay High Court
in K.K. Verma v. Union of India, AIR 1954 Bom 358.
East India Hotels Ltd. vs Syndicate Bank on 12 September, 1991
We have referred to this case because
it refers to the views expressed by Ramaswamy,J. in East
India Hotels case. This is so far as the first aspect referred
to by us earlier, is concerned."
Associated Hotels Of India Ltd vs R. N. Kapoor on 19 May, 1959
7. It has been held in Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. R.N. Kapoor
:AIR 1959 SC 1262, that, if a document gives only a right to use the property
in a particular way or under certain terms while it remains in possession
and control of the owner thereof it will be a licence. But if there is a
transfer of interest in land and exclusive possession is given to the grantee
then it is a lease. (in this context please also see Board of Revenue etc.
Krishna Kishore Firm vs Govt. Of. A.P. And Others on 21 September, 1990
His Lordship
referred to M.C. Chokkalingam vs. V. Manichava sagar and
to Krishna Kishore Firm vs. Government of A.P . The
possession of a tenant whose tenancy expired was a tenant
at sufferance and his possession Was not lawful' and he
was not entitled to renewal. No writ could be issued to the
licensing authority.
Deoraj vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 6 April, 2004
In Deoraj
v. State of Maharashtra and others (AIR 2004 SC 1975) it is held: