Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. vs Abhijit Singh Pawar on 26 November, 2018
16. We must observe at this stage that there is nothing
http://www.judis.nic.in
9/12
W.P.No.30779 of 2017
on record to suggest that the decision taken by the
authorities concerned in rejecting the candidature of the
respondent was in any way actuated by mala fides or
suffered on any other count. The decision on the question
of suitability of the respondent, in our considered view,
was absolutely correct and did not call for any
interference. We, therefore, allow this appeal, set aside the
decisions rendered by the Single Judge [Abhijit Singh
Pawar v. State of M.P., WP No. 9412 of 2013, order dated
31-7-2014 (MP)] as well as by the Division Bench [State
of M.P. v. Abhijit Singh Pawar, 2015 SCC OnLine MP
7517] and dismiss Writ Petition No. 9412 of 2013
preferred by the respondent. No costs.''
Section 435 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Of Police And Anr vs Mehar Singh on 2 July, 2013
The decision in Mohd.
Imran [Mohd. Imran v. State of Maharashtra, Civil Appeal
No. 10571 of 2018, order dated 12-10-2018 (SC)] thus
turned on individual facts and cannot in any way be said
to have departed from the line of decisions rendered by
this Court in Mehar Singh [Commr. of Police v. Mehar
Singh, (2013) 7 SCC 685 : (2013) 3 SCC (Cri) 669 :