Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)Section 188 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 July, 2014
In the aforesaid decision at paragraph 27, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
observed that the scope and object of Sections 41 and 41A are facets
of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, referring to the judgment of
Arnesh Kumar (supra), particularly paragraphs 7 to 12 thereof.
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Amandeep Singh Johar vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 7 February, 2018
Considering the aforesaid action taken, in due
compliance with the order passed by the Delhi High
Court in Amandeep Singh Johar v. State (NCT of
Delhi) [Amandeep Singh Johar v. State (NCT of Delhi),
2018 SCC OnLine Del 13448] dated 7-2-2018, this Court
has also passed an order in Abhyanand
Sharma v. State of Bihar [Abhyanand Sharma v. State
of Bihar, (2022) 10 SCC 819 : 2022 SCC OnLine SC 784]
dated 10-5-2021 (sic 10-5-2022) directing the State of
Bihar to look into the said aspect of an appropriate
modification to give effect to the mandate of Section 41-
A. A recent judgment has also been rendered on the
16
2025:CHC-AS:1826
same lines by the High Court of Jharkhand in Mahesh
Kumar Chaudhary v. State of Jharkhand [Mahesh
Kumar Chaudhary v. State of Jharkhand, 2022 SCC
OnLine Jhar 620] dated 16-6-2022.
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022
19. Similarly, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender
Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr2
particularly in paragraphs 26 to 32 held as under:-