Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.33 seconds)Section 29 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Rajendra Bharti vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 December, 2021
28. The Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh in case of
Rajendra Singh Bhati v. State of M.P (supra), where the chargesheet
was filed after the period of 60 days before the tea break, whereas the
application seeking default bail was filed after the tea break, held that
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KAMALDEEP KAUR CRL.REV.P. 1176/2023 Page 13 of 15
Signing Date:25.05.2024
20:30:26
the accused will not get the benefit of Section 167(2) of the CrPC
since the application was filed after the filing of the chargesheet.
Uday Mohanlal Acharya vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 March, 2001
In the case of Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of
Maharashtra (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the
indefeasible right to default bail extinguishes, the moment the
chargesheet is filed by the investigating agency:
Enforcement Directorate Government Of ... vs Kapil Wadhawan on 27 March, 2023
(2014) 9 SCC 457 ; Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of
Maharashtra: (2001) 5 SCC 453 ; Sanjay Dutt v. Bombay through
C.B.I.: 1994 (5) SCC 410, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a recent
decision in Enforcement Directorate v. Kapil Wadhawan: 2023 SCC
Online SC 972 observed as under:
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Rakesh Kumar Paul vs State Of Assam on 16 August, 2017
In Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam, a three-judge
Bench of this Court while examining the ratio in Union of
India v. Nirala Yadav and Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State
of Maharashtra, observed that on the expiry of the 60/90
day period as the case may be, an indefeasible right accrues
in favour of the accused for being released on bail on
account of default by the investigating agency in completion
of the investigation within the prescribed period.
Section 61 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
U.O.I. Thr. Cbi vs Nirala Yadav@Raja Ram Yadav@Deepak ... on 30 June, 2014
In Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam, a three-judge
Bench of this Court while examining the ratio in Union of
India v. Nirala Yadav and Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State
of Maharashtra, observed that on the expiry of the 60/90
day period as the case may be, an indefeasible right accrues
in favour of the accused for being released on bail on
account of default by the investigating agency in completion
of the investigation within the prescribed period.