Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)
Dr. Dheeraj Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 August, 2017 cites

Kamesh Panjiyar @ Kamlesh Panjiyar vs State Of Bihar on 1 February, 2005

No doubt, some of the witnesses e.g. PW 5 Dashrath Singh, who is the father of the deceased Gayatri, and PW 3 Santosh Kr. Singh, brother of the deceased, have stated that the deceased Gayatri told them that dowry was demanded by not only Raja Lal Singh, but also the appellants Pradip Singh and his wife Sanjana Devi, but we are of the opinion that it is possible that the names of Pradip Singh and Sanjana Devi have been introduced only to spread the net wide as often happens in cases like under Sections 498-A and 394 IPC, as has been observed in several decisions of this Court e.g. in Kamesh Panjiyar v. State of Bihar [(2005) 2 SCC 388], etc. Hence, we allow the appeal of Pradip Singh and Sanjana Devi and set aside the impugned judgments of the High Court and the trial court insofar as it relates to them and we direct that they be released forthwith unless required in connection with some other case."
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 157 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Geeta Mehrotra & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 17 October, 2012

By relying on judgments passed by the Supreme Court in cases of Geeta Mehrotra Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 741, Preeti Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand, reported in (2010) 7 SCC 667, it is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that there are to be some what specific and clear allegations against the relatives of the husband. There is an increasing tendency in the society to over- implicate the near and dear relatives of the husband so as to pressurize the husband.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1248 - G S Misra - Full Document
1