Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.23 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 9 in Telangana Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982
Telangana Abolition of Inams Act, 1955
Section 3 in Telangana Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Shri Lokraj And Ors vs Kishan Lal And Ors on 11 January, 1995
22. The decision in Lokraj's case (supra) relied upon by the
writ petitioners relates to adjudication of rights in a partition suit
without there being any grabbing in terms of Section 9 of the
Inams Abolition Act. There is no dispute with regard to the
conclusion reached in the aforementioned decision. But in the
instant case, as indicated above, the respondents/applicants have
absolute right to protect the property and invoke the jurisdiction
of the Special Court. Further, though in the instant case, there is
no re-grant of subject land in favour of the applicants, that would
Dr.SA,J & EVV,J
18 W.P.No.3864 of 2006
not disable them to institute proceedings before the Land
Grabbing Court, so also for the Land Grabbing Court to exercise
power under Section 8 of Land Grabbing Act and determine the
act of alleged land grabbing. Therefore, the said decision has no
application to the facts and circumstances of the case on hand.
The Code Of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002
Surya Dev Rai vs Ram Chander Rai & Ors on 7 August, 2003
23. Here, it is appropriate to refer the decision in Surya Dev
Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai2, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court
summarized various circumstances under which the High Court
can exercise its jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution, which are as under: