Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.54 seconds)The Punjab Land Revenue Rules
J.M. Narayana And Ors. vs Corporation Of The City Of Bangalore, By ... on 17 December, 2003
However, the decision of the other learned Single Judge in
R.ANANDA VS. NANJUNDASWAMY, 2006 SCC ONLINE KAR
557 being repugnant to the ratio laid down by the Division Bench in
12
J.Narayana supra, does not reflect the correct position of law and
therefore, lacks precedential value.
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964
Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958
Section 110 in Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Subhakar And Others vs The Land Tribunal, Karkala Taluk, ... on 22 February, 1999
(b) The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that
the suit property being a 'punja land' has to be necessarily treated
as an agricultural land, is bit difficult to countenance. True it is, that
the term 'agricultural land' is broadly defined by section 2(18) of
the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. A Division Bench of this
court in SUBHAKAR VS. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, 1999 (4)
Kar.L.J 524, has classified punja lands into six categories and held
"...punja lands are not agricultural lands as only thatched grass are
grown in those lands naturally and such lands are not brought
under cultivation...".