Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.72 seconds)Section 398 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 193 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 2014
Petitioner has appeared in the witness box during
trial as PW1. A perusal of the cross-examination of the
petitioner reveals that Nidhi has already filed a case against
her husband under Section 125 Cr. P.C. claiming
maintenance in the year 2009-2010. Thus, the relations
between the deceased and his wife were not cordial for about
more than three years prior to the lodging of the FIR. It
MAHAVIR SINGH appears that due to the strained relations, the complainant
2015.01.23 17:18
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh
CRR No.202 of 2015 5
moved application for summoning Nidhi wife of the deceased,
Neelam Rani mother-in-law of Parmod Kumar, Sunny
brother-in-law of Parmod Kumar and Charanjit Sehgal father-
in-law of Parmod Kumar to face the trial as additional
accused. The said persons were found innocent during
investigation. Learned trial Court, in the facts and
circumstances of the present case, had rightly held that there
was no substantial evidence on record to show the
involvement of the persons now sought to be summoned as
additional accused in the alleged crime. There is no quarrel
with the preposition of law settled by the Apex Court in
Hardeep Singh's case (supra), but the same fails to advance
the case of the petitioner.
Section 202 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 300 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1