Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.88 seconds)Section 10 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Bhura vs Kashi Ram on 5 January, 1994
"In view of the dictum of Hon'ble the Supreme Court
in Bhura's case (supra) as well as facts of the present case
as detailed above. I am of the considered opinion that Dr.
Shiv Dev Kaur Grewal respondent had no right to will way
or alienate the suit property in any manner whatsoever.
The Will dated 28.2.1991 as well as the codicil dated
25.8.1995, allegedly executed by Dr. Shiv Dev Kaur
Grewal deceased are illegal and non est in the eyes of law.
After the death of Dr. Shiv Dev Kaur Grewal respondent,
the suit property is required to be reverted to the legal
heirs of Lt. Col. Shiv Dev Singh Grewal deceased, father of
Dr. R.S. Grewal appellant. Only the legal heirs of Shiv Dev
Singh deceased, son of testator Hira Singh, who are the
owners of the suit property are held to have succeeded.
The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Section 9 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [Entire Act]
G. Ponniah Thevar vs Nellayam Perumal Pillai And Others on 15 December, 1976
The relevant paras of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme
Court in G. Ponniah Thevar's case rendered vis-a-vis the status of the tenant
would reads thus:-