Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

??`?W??Ul????O???M?.??P? ?;J ... vs ? ?/?F??G;?S? ... on 27 August, 2008

4. He further contends that the Eandiords have other shops and hence thereiiiistno: V» for them to maintain a Petition soiiipfa is concerned. Notwithstan.d'in._g.' thAet.eQiden:Q.é'- the said effect it wouid be of the landlord to decide that are required by him and requirement would havepfltiov ::bve'Ving"'b:onafide and for the purpose same having been ground avaiiabie to the peunoneg" A T R V. Sf} further contended that ostensibly the only reason.:fe.rV"fiVij;n.§}~*the Petition is to extract higher rent.
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 90 - A Kureshi - Full Document
1