Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)

Rajinder Kumar Kindra vs Delhi Administration Through ... on 27 September, 1984

4. To buttress the submission, the appellant relied upon two decisions, namely - Icon Printing Process (P) Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi2 and 2 2007 (4) Ad (Delhi) LPA 120/2021 Page 3 of 10 Signature Not Verified Digitaaly Signed By:BHUPINDER SINGH ROHELLA Signing Date:11.04.2023 13:07:44 Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2442-DB Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Administration3, wherein engagement of a worker in order to meet the daily sustenance needs of his family or extending help to the father in father's shop, was not held to be gainful employment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 357 - D A Desai - Full Document

North East Karnataka Road Transport ... vs M.Nagangouda on 9 January, 2007

5. Per contra, the respondent advanced that the appellant was managing the shop by himself. It was contended that the appellant's father had two businesses - halwai shop and catering business - and the appellant was single handedly deriving the entire income out of one shop which was managed by him. A video was placed on record to advance this submission which revealed the presence of the appellant at the said shop. The respondent also advanced the submission that even self-employment falls within the scope of gainful employment and reliance in this regard was placed upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation v. M. Nagangouda4.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 86 - A Kabir - Full Document

Icon Printing Process (P) Ltd. vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr. on 21 March, 2007

4. To buttress the submission, the appellant relied upon two decisions, namely - Icon Printing Process (P) Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi2 and 2 2007 (4) Ad (Delhi) LPA 120/2021 Page 3 of 10 Signature Not Verified Digitaaly Signed By:BHUPINDER SINGH ROHELLA Signing Date:11.04.2023 13:07:44 Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2442-DB Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Administration3, wherein engagement of a worker in order to meet the daily sustenance needs of his family or extending help to the father in father's shop, was not held to be gainful employment.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - H Kohli - Full Document
1