Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (1.19 seconds)

Rajinder Kumar vs Kuldeep Singh & Ors on 7 February, 2014

"It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and FIR No.799 799 dated 06.12.2025, registered under Section 209 of the BNS, 2023,, at Police Station Civil Line Sirsa,, District Sirsa and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, including order dated 17.07.2025 (Annexure P-2)2) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sirsa, in complaint CIS No.NACT No.NACT-201-2023 (Annexure P-1) 1) titled as "Rohit ohit Kumar versus Kuldeep", thereby, the petitioner has been declared as Proclaimed Person, in view of the fact that the said complaint having been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 21.01.2026 (Annexure P-4) in pursuance to mutual settlement between the parties,, justice."
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 28 - Full Document

Vikas Sharma vs Gurpreet Singh Kohli And Another on 13 September, 2017

XX XXX XXXX Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decisions rendered by this Court in "Vikas Sharma v. Gurpreet Singh Kohli and another (supra), 2017, (3) L.A.R.584, Microqual Techno Limited and others v. State of Haryana and another, 2015 (32) RCR (Criminal) 790 and "Rajneesh Khanna v. State of Haryana and another" 2017 (3) L.A.R. 555 wherein in an identical circumstance, this Court has held that since the main petition filed under Section 138 of the Act stands withdrawn in view of an amicable settlement between the parties, therefore, continuation of proceedings under Section 174A of IPC shall be nothing but an abuse of the process of law.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 339 - A S Grewal - Full Document
1   2 Next