Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.15 seconds)Shakuntla Devi Jain vs Kanta Kumari And Ors. on 22 December, 1967
Shakuntala Devi Jain Vs. Kanta Kumary & others (1968 Dlt 528), and submitted that in the case of Government, public interest has to be duly considered and comparatively speaking longer time must be required for inquiry and consideration before a final decision is taken and acted upon. There if therefore difference in exercise of discretion in respect of an individual litigant and a Government department. He also submitted that the words ''sufficient cause" should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice when no negligence nor inaction nor want of bona fides is imputable to the appellants.
K.R. Beri And Co. And Ors. vs Employees State Insurance Corporation on 20 March, 1961
(10) Counsel for the appellants conceded that it is necessary for the appellants to explain the cause of each day's delay, but no explanation is to be found in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, or in the supporting affidavit, as to why the decision to file an appeal was not taken by the Board on 27-9-1970 or 29-9-1970 or even on 30-5-70 when all these days were working days. On the other hand, the decision to file an appeal was itself taken on 2-10-1970 i.e. 3 or 5 days after the appeal had become barred by- time. It is well-known that once limitation has run out its operation cannot be stayed by any action taken by the appellants after that date. Counsel for appellants invited our attention to the following deci- sions :- 1. M/s, K.R. Beri and Co. and others Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation (1962 Punjab 308). 2.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1