Sh. Avtar Singh And Another vs K.K.Sharma And Another on 3 August, 2010
The
manager of the plaintiff PW1 Sh. Tej Gautam has, in his crossexamination,
denied the suggestion that any person by the name of Sh. V. Sharma/V.K.
Sharma is working in the company of the plaintiff. The defendant no. 2 has
made no attempt to disprove this assertion. It is relevant to note that the
defendant no.2 did not ask PW1 to produce the rolls of the employees of the
plaintiff or any other record indicating the names of the employees of the
plaintiff. It appears that the defendant no.2 has accepted the statement of
PW1 that there is no employee by the name of Sh. Sharma in the office of
plaintiff. Since no such person was employed with the plaintiff, the plea of
the defendant no.2 that he had made payment to such person appears to be
false and concocted.