Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.32 seconds)Section 126 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 15 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shamim Ara vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 1 October, 2002
6. The view expressed by the First Revisional Court that no
Muslim woman can maintain petition under Section 125
Cr.P.C. is clearly unsustainable. The Act only applies to
divorced women and not to a woman who is not divorced. The
conclusions that in view of the statement in the written
statement about alleged divorce 30 years by utterance of the
words "Talaq" "Talaq" "Talaq" three times is sufficient in law
is not sustainable. This Court in Shamim Ara v. State of U.P.
and Anr. (2002 (7) SCC 518) observed:
Section 3 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Danial Latifi & Anr vs Union Of India on 28 September, 2001
7. The conclusions about the Mehr having been paid and
the Iddat period is over has no relevance. A Constitution
Bench of this Court in Danial Latifi and Anr. V. Union of India
(2001 (7) SCC 746) observed as follows:
Vijay Kumar Prasad vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 7 April, 2004
In Vijay
Kumar Prasad v. State of Bihar and Ors. (2004 (5) SCC 196), it
was held that proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. are civil
in nature. It was noted as follows:
1