Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.03 seconds)The Societies Registration Act, 1860
Article 243 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mohinder Singh Gill And Anr. vs Chief Election Commissioner And Ors. on 25 April, 1977
In order to avoid a large number of writ petitions filed for quashing the orders passed by the educational authorities during the process of elections and in seeking directions to them, we hereby declare that the principles of law laid down by the Supreme Court in N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer, AIR 1952 SC 64; Harcharan Singh v. Mohinder Singh & Ors., AIR 1968 SC 1500; Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr. v. The Chief Election Commissioner, AIR 1978 SC 851; Jyoti Basu & Ors. v. Debi Ghosal & Ors., AIR 1982 SC 983; Harikrishna Lal v. Babu Lal Marandi, (2003) 8 SCC 613 and Shyamdeo Pd. Singh v. Naval Kishore Yadav, (2000) 8 SCC 46 restraining the courts from interfering in the process of election after the elections are notified is equally applicable to the elections of the office bearers of the committee of management of the societies as well as the Committee of Management to be elected in accordance with the provisions of the scheme of administration of the educational institutions. The principles of law that the Courts should keep their hand off in electoral matters and that all election disputes must be tried by the Election Tribunal, is also incorporated in the Constitution of India under Art.329 (b) for the elections of the Parliament or to the house or either house of the legislature, under Art.243 O for the elections of Panchayats and Art.243 ZG in the matter of elections of the municipalities.
Jyoti Basu & Others vs Debi Ghosal & Others on 26 February, 1982
In order to avoid a large number of writ petitions filed for quashing the orders passed by the educational authorities during the process of elections and in seeking directions to them, we hereby declare that the principles of law laid down by the Supreme Court in N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer, AIR 1952 SC 64; Harcharan Singh v. Mohinder Singh & Ors., AIR 1968 SC 1500; Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr. v. The Chief Election Commissioner, AIR 1978 SC 851; Jyoti Basu & Ors. v. Debi Ghosal & Ors., AIR 1982 SC 983; Harikrishna Lal v. Babu Lal Marandi, (2003) 8 SCC 613 and Shyamdeo Pd. Singh v. Naval Kishore Yadav, (2000) 8 SCC 46 restraining the courts from interfering in the process of election after the elections are notified is equally applicable to the elections of the office bearers of the committee of management of the societies as well as the Committee of Management to be elected in accordance with the provisions of the scheme of administration of the educational institutions. The principles of law that the Courts should keep their hand off in electoral matters and that all election disputes must be tried by the Election Tribunal, is also incorporated in the Constitution of India under Art.329 (b) for the elections of the Parliament or to the house or either house of the legislature, under Art.243 O for the elections of Panchayats and Art.243 ZG in the matter of elections of the municipalities.
Harikrishna Lal vs Babu Lal Marandi on 30 October, 2003
In order to avoid a large number of writ petitions filed for quashing the orders passed by the educational authorities during the process of elections and in seeking directions to them, we hereby declare that the principles of law laid down by the Supreme Court in N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer, AIR 1952 SC 64; Harcharan Singh v. Mohinder Singh & Ors., AIR 1968 SC 1500; Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr. v. The Chief Election Commissioner, AIR 1978 SC 851; Jyoti Basu & Ors. v. Debi Ghosal & Ors., AIR 1982 SC 983; Harikrishna Lal v. Babu Lal Marandi, (2003) 8 SCC 613 and Shyamdeo Pd. Singh v. Naval Kishore Yadav, (2000) 8 SCC 46 restraining the courts from interfering in the process of election after the elections are notified is equally applicable to the elections of the office bearers of the committee of management of the societies as well as the Committee of Management to be elected in accordance with the provisions of the scheme of administration of the educational institutions. The principles of law that the Courts should keep their hand off in electoral matters and that all election disputes must be tried by the Election Tribunal, is also incorporated in the Constitution of India under Art.329 (b) for the elections of the Parliament or to the house or either house of the legislature, under Art.243 O for the elections of Panchayats and Art.243 ZG in the matter of elections of the municipalities.
Shyamdeo Pd. Singh vs Nawal Kishore Yadav on 28 August, 2000
7. Relying on the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment, the submission of Sri Singh is that as the election process has already commenced by declaring election program by means of the impugned order dated 31.05.2022, the writ petition filed challenging the same is not maintainable and if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may seek remedy for redressal of their grievances by challenging the elections after completion thereof.
Banwari Lal Kanchal vs Dr. Bhartendu Agarwal & Ors. on 20 November, 2019
In support of his submission, he has placed reliance rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Banwari Lal Kanchal Vs. Bhartendu Agarwal and Others reported in 2019 (12) ADJ 235 (DB) (LB) in which the following questions had been formulated for decision. Answering the aforesaid question, this Court held that:-
The Punjab Municipal Act, 1999
Basant Prasad Srivastava And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others on 7 May, 1993
4. Sri Singh has placed reliance upon the case in Basant Prasad Srivastava vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 1994 Allahabad 112 where the Division Bench has held as follows:-