Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)

State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.Etc vs Ganesh Wood Products & Ors.Etc on 11 September, 1995

12. Case of prosecution is that all the four boys including the two accused were sleeping on the footpath of   Vankhandi   Mandir.     According   to   PW3,   about   20 persons   were   sleeping   on   the   footpath.     PW3   further cited   that   some   of   the   20   persons   sleeping   on   the footpath had covered their faces with one or the other cloth but PW4 displayed ignorance if those persons had covered their faces with blanket or not. PW3 could not tell as to who had caught hold of which of the accused and   their   companions.   As   noticed   above,   PW2­ complainant   has   not   supported   the   case   of   the prosecution   regarding   apprehension/arrest   of   the   two accused   persons   and   companions.     He   has   also   not identified   them   as   the   offenders.   Further,   he   has   not                                               State v. Ganesh etc. 12  supported the case of prosecution regarding recovery of currency notes from anyone of them.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 160 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1