Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)
Shantisagar Co-Operative Housing ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Its Govt. ... on 4 May, 2026
cites
Section 154B in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960
Section 91 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Whirlpool Corporation vs Registrar Of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors on 26 October, 1998
8. The legal position governing the exercise of writ jurisdiction
in the face of an alternate remedy is no longer res integra and
stands authoritatively settled by the judgment of the Supreme
Court in Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks,
Mumbai, (1998) 8 SCC 1 wherein it has been held that the
existence of an alternate remedy does not operate as an absolute
bar to the maintainability of a writ petition, particularly in cases
where the impugned action is wholly without jurisdiction or is
vitiated by patent illegality. In the facts of the present case, for the
reasons which are elaborated hereinafter, this Court is prima facie
of the considered opinion that the impugned order suffers from a
jurisdictional infirmity and is ex facie without authority of law.
Consequently, the petition deserves to be entertained
notwithstanding the availability of an alternate remedy.
Section 152 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Section 154 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1