Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.33 seconds)Section 7 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Kanshi Ram Jagan Nath And Others vs The State on 28 July, 1961
26. The difference of analysis in respect of fat content on dry
weight matter in respect of sample of paneer by the report of two
analysts are not within acceptable range of 0.3% . Complainant
has failed to explain the variation of 2.94% in milk fat of dry
matter in respect of counterpart of same sample. Thereby relying
upon Kashi Nath versus State (supra), I am of the considered
view that the sample was not representative.
Section 20 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State vs Anil Batra And Ors. on 2 April, 2008
In State v. Anil Batra and others 2008(I) FAC 191 (Del), it was
observed as follows: