Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (3.99 seconds)Paradise Credit P.Ltd. & Ors. vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 December, 2013
In Paradise Credit Ltd. & Ors. vs. State of NCT
of Delhi (supra), the accused had sold shares hypothecated
with him by the complainant as security. In that case, the trial
Court dismissed an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C.
without waiting for status report of EOW seeking time to verify
the facts. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi restored the application
under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. for hearing after complete status
report is obtained from EOW.
Lalmuni Devi vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 15 December, 2000
In Lalmuni Devi vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
(supra) and Rajesh Bajaj vs. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
(supra), Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held that because civil
action can be taken, it does not mean that a criminal complaint
is not maintainable.
Ramdev Food Products Private Limited vs State Of Gujarat on 16 March, 2015
In Ramdev Food Products (P) Ltd. vs. State of
Gujarat (supra), Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held as under:
M/S. Hero Fincorp Limited vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr. on 4 January, 2022
In M/s. Hero Fincorp Limited vs. The State
(NCT of Delhi) & Anr. (supra), the respondent No. 2 had taken
loan of substantial amount for purchase of machines. The
respondent No. 2 did not purchase the machines and
misappropriated the said amount. In that context, Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi held that the complaint disclosed a cognizable
offence which warranted police investigation.
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Balbir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 10 November, 1994
1. The criminal revision petition under Section 397
of 'The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973' (Hereinafter referred
to as 'Cr.P.C.') is directed against an order dated 26.08.2019 (In
short 'the impugned order') in complaint case vide Case No.
17580/2018 titled as 'Balbir Singh vs. State' whereby Ld. MM-
09, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (Hereinafter
referred to as 'the trial Court') dismissed an application under
Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. seeking direction to SHO, PS Burari to
register FIR against the respondent No. 2 to 4.
BRIEF FACTS:
Anil Kumar & Ors vs M.K Aiyappa & Anr on 1 October, 2013
In Anil
Kumar v. M.K. Aiyappa, (2013) 10 SCC 705, it was
observed: (SCC p. 711, para 11)
Crl.
Section 154 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Rajesh Bajaj vs State Nct Of Delhi And Others on 12 March, 2000
(i) The trial Court did not consider the case law relied
by the petitioner i.e. Paradise Credit P. Ltd. & Ors.
vs. State of NCT of Delhi, Lalmuni Devi vs. State
of Bihar & Ors. and Rajesh Bajaj vs. State of NCT
of Delhi & Ors.