Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.56 seconds)

Nikhat Parveen vs Mohammad Awais on 2 August, 2019

15. Accordingly, this revision is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 13.4.2023 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kushinagar at Padrauna in Criminal Case No.877/2021 (Nikhat Parveen and another Vs. Md. Ovaid) is hereby set aside. The matter is remanded to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kushinagar at Padrauna to decide the case filed by the revisionists under Section 125 Cr.P.C., afresh. It is expected that the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kushinagar at Padrauna shall proceed in the matter expeditiously and shall decide the case within a period of one year from the date.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohammad Abdul Samad vs State Of Telangana on 4 July, 2019

12. So far as the second ground taken by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kushinagar at Padrauna to reject the application filed by the revisionists under Section 125 Cr.P.C. that parties belong to Muslim religion therefore, they are governed by the provisions made in their personal law, is concerned, I find that the issue had already been decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its judgment rendered in the case of Mohd. Abdul Samad Vs. State of Telangana & Anr. 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1686. The relevant paragraphs of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court are extracted as under:-
Telangana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Shavili - Full Document
1   2 Next