Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.21 seconds)Section 52 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Excise Act, 2009
Section 4 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Section 165 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Roop Chand vs The State Of Haryana on 8 October, 2021
In case titled as Roop Chand Vs. State of Haryana reported as CC
Cases 3 (HC), it was held as that where the police has failed to join
independent witnesses in the investigation despite their availability and
further failed to take action against those who refused to take part in
investigation nor their names were noted down by the police, the explanation
of the police for not joining independent witnesses is an after thought and
liable to be rejected.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Hem Raj & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 29 March, 2005
20. Further, in the case of Hem Raj Vs. State of Haryana AIR 2005
FIR No. 355/2012 State Vs. Laxmi Page No. 7 of 10
SC 2110, it has been observed that:-
Massa Singh And Another vs Financial Commissioner (Appeals-1) ... on 3 December, 2008
In the case of Massa Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2000(2)C.C.
Cases HC 11, conviction was set aside on the ground that it was obligatory
on the part of investigating officer to take assistance of independent
witnesses to lend authenticity to the investigation conducted by him. It was
observed as under:-