Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.42 seconds)

Anisa Begum vs Masoom Ali And Ors. on 8 November, 1985

Public   Prosecutor.     At   the   very   Outset   I   may   observe   that   the revision petitions impugn the orders passed by the Ld. Trial Court dismissing   the   applications   for   release   of  animals   /   vehicle carrying the animals on Superdari.  When a similar issue came up for consideration before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the year 1985 in the case of Anisa Begum Vs. Masoom Ali & Ors. (Supra) it   was  observed  by Hon'ble  Mr.  Justice  J.D.  Jain  that  the  order dismissing the Superdari application did not decide the rights of the Vijender Vs. State (Crl. Revision 36/18) Page No. 23 of 44 parties and was an interlocutory order against which no revision petition   would   lie.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 31 - Full Document

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs The Micro And Small Enterprises ... on 18 September, 2017

On a parity of reasoning I am unable to subscribe to  the following  observations  of a  learned  Single Judge   of   Andhra   Pradesh   in   Bharat   Heavy Electricals   Ltd.   (supra):   "The   order   in   question substantially affects the rights of the parties. If so, it cannot be considered to be an interlocutory order."
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 29 - V Bakhru - Full Document
1   2 3 Next