cites: 39408132

1 - 3 of 3 (0.16 seconds)

Poonam Khurana & Anr. vs Ved Parkash Khurana & Anr. on 17 August, 2015 cites

Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ld.Tr.Dir vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 11 October, 2011

It was only when the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Suraj Lamp (supra), that the said practice labeled as pernicious by the Supreme Court, was put to an end.

Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 1760 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Shri Ramesh Chand vs Suresh Chand & Anr. on 9 April, 2012

In my view, the present case is on a much better footing than Ramesh Chand (supra), since the appellant/ defendant had executed not only the Possession Letter, but thereafter also gave an undertaking (Ex. PW-4/1) on 22.12.2001 to vacate the suit premises on or before 15.04.2002.

Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 320 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Section 53A in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 5385

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ld.Tr.Dir vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 11 October, 2011

Shri Ramesh Chand vs Suresh Chand & Anr. on 9 April, 2012

Section 53A in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]