Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.33 seconds)The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Section 39 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956
Consumer Protection Act, 2019
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Muhammed vs Joint Regional Transport Officer on 21 August, 2011
It does not postpone the vesting of property in the motor vehicle, but only
imposes certain restriction on the dealer to deliver it to the purchaser. Here
Sub-section (1) of Sec.20 of the SG Act is required to be revisited. It states
that property in the good is transferred if the good is in the deliverable state,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
10/18
C.M.A.No.1066 of 2022
even if the delivery is postponed. Therefore, Rule 42 of the CMV Rules on
its face only requires the postponement of delivery of the motor vehicle till it
is registered either temporarily or permanently. The breach in the instant
case is not about vesting of the property in the two wheeler in the second
respondent, but about its delivery to the second respondent before its
registration. Here it is apposite to refer to the ratio in Muhammed Vs Joint
Regional Transport Officer & Others [2012 SCC Online Ker 31641 :