Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.42 seconds)Ramji Lal Ram Lal And Anr. vs State Of Punjab Through Secretary To ... on 6 December, 1965
The
law stated in Ramji Lal v. the State of Punjab(2) is sound:
The Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953
Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu vs The Motor & General Traders on 18 March, 1975
Venkateswarlu (supra), read in its
statutory setting, falls in this category. Where a cause o
action is deficient but later events have made up the
deficiency, the Court may, in order to avoid multiplicity of
litigation, permit amendment and continue the proceeding,
provided no prejudice is caused to the other side. All these
are done only in exceptional situations and just cannot be
done if the statute, on which the legal proceeding is based,
inhibits, by its scheme or otherwise, such change in cause
of action or relief. The primary concern of the court is to
implement the justice of the legislation. Rights vested by
virtue of a statute cannot be divested by this equitable
doctrine (See Chokalingam Chetty: 54 Mad.L.J. 88 P.C.).
Section 24 in The Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 [Entire Act]
The Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953
The Punjab Tenancy Rules
1