Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)Section 300 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Arjun And Anr. Etc. Etc vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 14 February, 2017
In the matter of Arjun (supra), the Supreme Court has held that
when and if there is intent and knowledge, the same would be
case of Section 304 Part-I IPC and if it is only a case of
knowledge and not the intention to cause murder and bodily
injury, then same would be a case of Section 304 Part-II IPC.
State Tr.P.S.Lodhi Colony,New Delhi vs Sanjeev Nanda on 3 August, 2012
16. Likewise, in the matter of State v. Sanjeev Nanda3, their
Lordships of the Supreme Court have held that once knowledge
that it is likely to cause death is established but without any
intention to cause death, then jail sentence may be for a term
which may extend to 10 years or with fine or with both. It is
further been held that to make out an offence punishable under
Section 304 Part II of the IPC, the prosecution has to prove the
death of the person in question and such death was caused by
the act of the accused and that he knew that such act of his is
likely to cause death.
Sukhbir Singh vs State Of Haryana on 20 February, 2002
In order to consider whether the case of the appellant/accused
Laxman Muchaki is covered with Exception 4 to Section 300 of
IPC, it would be appropriate to notice the decision rendered by
the Supreme Court in the matter of Sukhbir Singh v. State of
Haryana1 wherein it has been observed as under :-
Rambir vs State Of Nct Delhi on 6 May, 2019
19. Further, the Supreme Court in the matter of Rambir vs. State
(NCT of Delhi) {(2019) 6 SCC 122} has laid down four
ingredients which should be tested to bring a case within the
purview of Exception 4 to Section 300 of IPC, which reads as
under: