Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)

Meenakshi vs Ramesh Khanna And Anr. on 16 May, 1995

It is also a well settled law that mere denial of ownership is no denial at all as also been held in a case titled Meenakshi vs. Ramesh Khanna and another 60 (1995) DLT 524 by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi relied on behalf of the petitioner. Even the payment of rent by the respondent to the petitioner no.1 has been admitted. It is a well settled law that the tenant can not challenge the title of the landlord during the occupation of the tenanted premises and if he wants to challenge the title, he has to vacate the tenanted premises. Moreover, the petitioner has shown that he is more than the tenant in the suit property. On the other hand, the assertion of the respondent is merely a bald assertion without any document to substantiate the same. Hence, it appears that this ground has been taken by E. No. 187/2009 10 of 17 respondent no.1 just for the sake of defence without having any substance in it and the same is rejected accordingly.
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 182 - A Kumar - Full Document
1