Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)
Satish vs The State (Govt Of Nct), Delhi on 15 October, 2015 cites

Rajeevan And Anr. vs State Of Kerala on 17 February, 2003

3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged that the Trial Court did not appreciate the evidence in its true and correct perspective and fell in grave error to rely upon the testimonies of interested witnesses. There was inordinate delay of two days in lodging First Information Report which creates doubt about the trustworthiness of the prosecution case. The prosecutrix and her mother have made vital improvements in their deposition in the Court. The prosecution was unable to establish the true and correct age of the prosecutrix. Crime weapon i.e. knife was not recovered during investigation. There was unexplained delay in sending samples to FSL. Non-examination of X's friends - Poonam and Anita are fatal to the prosecution case. Reliance has been placed on 'Thulika Kali vs. State of Tamil Nadu', 1972 (3) SCC 393; 'Maharaj Singh vs. State of UP', 1994 (5) SCC 188; 'Thanedar Singh vs. State of MP', 2002 (1) SCC 487; 'Rajeevan vs. State of Kerala', 2003 Cri.LJ 1572; 'State of Rajasthan vs. Gurmail Singh', 2005 (3) SCC 59 & 'Sujoy Sen vs. State of West Bengal', 2007 (6) SCC 32.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 104 - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Gurmail Singh on 23 February, 2005

3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged that the Trial Court did not appreciate the evidence in its true and correct perspective and fell in grave error to rely upon the testimonies of interested witnesses. There was inordinate delay of two days in lodging First Information Report which creates doubt about the trustworthiness of the prosecution case. The prosecutrix and her mother have made vital improvements in their deposition in the Court. The prosecution was unable to establish the true and correct age of the prosecutrix. Crime weapon i.e. knife was not recovered during investigation. There was unexplained delay in sending samples to FSL. Non-examination of X's friends - Poonam and Anita are fatal to the prosecution case. Reliance has been placed on 'Thulika Kali vs. State of Tamil Nadu', 1972 (3) SCC 393; 'Maharaj Singh vs. State of UP', 1994 (5) SCC 188; 'Thanedar Singh vs. State of MP', 2002 (1) SCC 487; 'Rajeevan vs. State of Kerala', 2003 Cri.LJ 1572; 'State of Rajasthan vs. Gurmail Singh', 2005 (3) SCC 59 & 'Sujoy Sen vs. State of West Bengal', 2007 (6) SCC 32.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 157 - Full Document

Sc W. P. No. 32829 (W) Of 2014 Sri Jyotish ... vs The State Of West Bengal on 1 April, 2015

3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged that the Trial Court did not appreciate the evidence in its true and correct perspective and fell in grave error to rely upon the testimonies of interested witnesses. There was inordinate delay of two days in lodging First Information Report which creates doubt about the trustworthiness of the prosecution case. The prosecutrix and her mother have made vital improvements in their deposition in the Court. The prosecution was unable to establish the true and correct age of the prosecutrix. Crime weapon i.e. knife was not recovered during investigation. There was unexplained delay in sending samples to FSL. Non-examination of X's friends - Poonam and Anita are fatal to the prosecution case. Reliance has been placed on 'Thulika Kali vs. State of Tamil Nadu', 1972 (3) SCC 393; 'Maharaj Singh vs. State of UP', 1994 (5) SCC 188; 'Thanedar Singh vs. State of MP', 2002 (1) SCC 487; 'Rajeevan vs. State of Kerala', 2003 Cri.LJ 1572; 'State of Rajasthan vs. Gurmail Singh', 2005 (3) SCC 59 & 'Sujoy Sen vs. State of West Bengal', 2007 (6) SCC 32.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 0 - Cited by 15 - D Datta - Full Document

Thulia Kali vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 25 February, 1972

3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged that the Trial Court did not appreciate the evidence in its true and correct perspective and fell in grave error to rely upon the testimonies of interested witnesses. There was inordinate delay of two days in lodging First Information Report which creates doubt about the trustworthiness of the prosecution case. The prosecutrix and her mother have made vital improvements in their deposition in the Court. The prosecution was unable to establish the true and correct age of the prosecutrix. Crime weapon i.e. knife was not recovered during investigation. There was unexplained delay in sending samples to FSL. Non-examination of X's friends - Poonam and Anita are fatal to the prosecution case. Reliance has been placed on 'Thulika Kali vs. State of Tamil Nadu', 1972 (3) SCC 393; 'Maharaj Singh vs. State of UP', 1994 (5) SCC 188; 'Thanedar Singh vs. State of MP', 2002 (1) SCC 487; 'Rajeevan vs. State of Kerala', 2003 Cri.LJ 1572; 'State of Rajasthan vs. Gurmail Singh', 2005 (3) SCC 59 & 'Sujoy Sen vs. State of West Bengal', 2007 (6) SCC 32.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 565 - H R Khanna - Full Document
1   2 Next