Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)

S. Bharat Kumar And Others vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 16 October, 2000

10. According to the Distribution Licensees, on the basis of the objections raised by public, information Page 12 of 26 Appeal no. 96 of 2013 and Appeal no. 130 of 2013 was sought by the Commission which was furnished by them. On this basis, it is contended that the subsequent information need not once again be required to be posed to public. This principle of law is settled by Division bench of High Court of Andhra Pradesh in S. Bharat Kumar and others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh in judgment reported as 2000(6) ALD 217.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 79 - Cited by 8 - P V Reddi - Full Document

U.P.Power Corporation Ltd vs National Thermal Power Corp.Ltd.& Ors on 3 March, 2009

22. According to the Respondent Distribution Licensees, depending on the availability of power, transmission constraints, etc., the market prices of Page 18 of 26 Appeal no. 96 of 2013 and Appeal no. 130 of 2013 power would vary. Therefore, considering the variation in the market prices as found in transaction carried out in the power exchange, the Commission has revised the ceiling price to Rs. 5.50 per unit as against Rs. 4.17/kWh that was fixed in the tariff order for FY 2012-13. The aspect of tariff, as decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, is a continuous process and the same can be revised during the tariff period depending upon the prevailing circumstances. The Respondents referred to the judgment reported at 2009 ELR (SC)0013 between UP Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. NTPC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 86 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1