Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001
M.M. Jamadhar vs Amirbi on 21 August, 1984
7. To substantiate his argument, Mr. Garg appearing on behalf of the petitioner has placed reliance upon MM. Jamadhar v. Amirbi . On the basis of this authority, Mr. Garg submits that no warrant for possession could te issued for delivery of possession against a tenant and a tenant is entitled to the protection of the provisions of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act. In that case, the following observations were made by Court:
Smt. Usha Jain And Ors. vs Manmohan Bajaj And Ors. on 1 April, 1980
In Madan Lal's case, Justice M.C. Jain of this Court rightly expressed his agreement with the view taken by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Smt. Usha Jain's case, and I respectfully agree with him.
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Shamsuddin vs Abbas Ali on 19 January, 1970
As regards the case of Shamsuddin(supra), Mr.Bardhar has no objection about the proposition of law laid down there in. While further making his submissions Mr. Bhirdhar submits that there are two provisions provided under the Code of Civil Procedure for filing objection-petition; one is under Order 21 Rule 58, CPC and the other provision is under Order 21 Rule 97, CPC and Order 21 Rule 130, CPC.
Jhumar Lal vs Hansraj And Anr. on 22 October, 1975
In Madan Lal's case, Justice M.C. Jain of this Court rightly expressed his agreement with the view taken by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Smt. Usha Jain's case, and I respectfully agree with him.
1