Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)
Smt. Riya vs Sh. Amarjeet Singh on 19 July, 2018 cites

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011

In view of celebrated judgment of "National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors.",  mentioned supra  delivered by Constitutional Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court,  a sum of Rs. 40,000/­ is awarded in favour of petitioner no. 1 Smt. Mohini Devi (being widow of deceased) towards loss of consortium.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10133 - K Kannan - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Pooja & Ors. on 2 November, 2017

44. After the celebrated judgment of "National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors.", mentioned supra, Hon'ble Delhi High Court in appeal titled as "Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pooja &  Ors",  mentioned   supra,   has   been   pleased   to   observe   in  para   18   of   the judgment that the constitution bench decision in Pranay Sethi (supra) does not recognize any other non­pecuniary head of damages. Hence, no amount of compensation is being awarded under this head.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 412 - R K Gauba - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sangeeta Devi & Ors on 22 February, 2016

58. In view of  my findings on issues no. 1 to 2,  I award a sum of Rs.  20,10,100/­  (including interim award amount if any) in MAC Petition No. 5201/16, a sum of Rs.  14,18,000/­ (including interim award amount if any) in MAC Petition No. 4814/16  and  a sum of Rs. 1,37,100/­ in MAC Petition No. 5200/16,  alongwith interest @ 9% per annum w.e.f. date of filing of petitions i.e.   11.09.2014     respectively   in   favour   of   petitioner(s)   and   against   the respondents   no.   1   &   2   jointly   and   severally.   (Reliance   placed   on   judgment "Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Sangeeta Devi & Ors bearing MAC. APP. 165/2011 decided on 22.02.2016).  Issue no. 3 is decided accordingly.
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 1285 - R K Gauba - Full Document

Vinod Kumar @ Bittoo vs Roshni & Ors. on 5 July, 2012

53. Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter titled as "  Vinod Kumar Bitoo Vs. Roshni & Ors." passed in appeal bearing no. MAC.APP 518/2010 decided on 05.07.12, has held as under:­ " It is difficult to measure the pain and suffering in terms of money which is suffered by a victim on account of serious injuries caused to him in a motor vehicle accident. Since the   compensation   is   required   to   be   paid   for   pain   and Smt. Riya & Ors, Smt. Mohini Devi & Ors. & Sh Himanshu Vs. Amarjeet Singh & Ors. Page 23  of  30  MACT Nos. 5201/16, 4814/16 & 5200/16  (Old Nos. 404/14, 405/14 & 406/14) FIR No. 206/14.; PS Murthal,Sonipat DOD: 19.07.2018 suffering   an   attempt   must   be   made   to   award compensation   which   may   have   some   objective   relation with the pain and suffering underwent by the victim. For this purpose, the Claims Tribunal and the Courts normally consider the nature of injury; the part of the body where the injuries were sustained, surgeries, if any, underwent by the victim, confinement in the hospital and the duration of treatment".
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 483 - G P Mittal - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

46. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of    "National Insurance Smt. Riya & Ors, Smt. Mohini Devi & Ors. & Sh Himanshu Vs. Amarjeet Singh & Ors. Page 20  of  30  MACT Nos. 5201/16, 4814/16 & 5200/16  (Old Nos. 404/14, 405/14 & 406/14) FIR No. 206/14.; PS Murthal,Sonipat DOD: 19.07.2018 Company  Ltd.  Vs. Pranay  Sethi  &  Ors."  mentioned  supra,  a sum  of  Rs. 15,000/­ each is awarded in favour of petitioners on account of loss of estate and funeral expenses.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document
1