Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.18 seconds)
M/S. Krbl Limited vs Ramesh Bansal & Another on 27 August, 2009 cites

Borosil Glass Works Ltd. vs O.P. Batra And Anr. on 10 October, 1995

6. The learned counsel for the plaintiff has taken me through the pleadings and documents as well as the affidavit by way of evidence filed by the plaintiff and has relied upon the judgments of this Court reported in Century Traders Vs.Roshan Lal Duggar & Co. AIR 1978 Delhi 259(DB); Borosil Glass Works Ltd. vs. O.P.Batra 1995 (16) PTC 55; M/s. Kumar Electric Works Vs. Anuj Electronics (1990) PTC 26 and Glaxo Operations UK Ltd., Middlesex (England) and others Vs. Samrat Pharmaceuticals, Kanpur AIR 1984 Delhi 265 to buttress his case of passing off and infringement of copyright by the defendants.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 4 - K Ramamoorthy - Full Document

Hero Honda Motors Ltd. vs Shree Assuramji Scooters on 29 November, 2005

Additionally, reference was made by the learned counsel for the plaintiff to the judgments of this Court in Hero Honda Motors Ltd. Vs. Shree Assuramji Scooters 2006(32) PTC 117 (Del) and Asian Paints (India) Ltd. Vs. Balaji Paints and Chemical and Anr. 2006(33) PTC 683 (Del) to contend that the plaintiff would also be entitled to damages. In the former case, damages of Rs.5 lacs and in the latter case damages of Rs.3 lacs were awarded in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff also claimed costs of the suit, in respect of which a certificate of costs dated 21.02.2009 for the sum of Rs.1,02,013/- was filed by the counsel for the plaintiff.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 96 - S K Kaul - Full Document

Asian Paints (India) Ltd. vs Balaji Paints And Chemicals And Ors. on 10 March, 2006

Additionally, reference was made by the learned counsel for the plaintiff to the judgments of this Court in Hero Honda Motors Ltd. Vs. Shree Assuramji Scooters 2006(32) PTC 117 (Del) and Asian Paints (India) Ltd. Vs. Balaji Paints and Chemical and Anr. 2006(33) PTC 683 (Del) to contend that the plaintiff would also be entitled to damages. In the former case, damages of Rs.5 lacs and in the latter case damages of Rs.3 lacs were awarded in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff also claimed costs of the suit, in respect of which a certificate of costs dated 21.02.2009 for the sum of Rs.1,02,013/- was filed by the counsel for the plaintiff.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 30 - S K Kaul - Full Document
1