Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.24 seconds)Section 3 in The Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Union Of India vs R. B. Ch. Raghunath Singh & Co on 27 July, 1979
15. These facts have been noted in view of
submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional
Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny
permission to undertake admission vests in the Central
Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of
Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set
aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been
restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court
did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of
permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the
case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College
and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission
at the very outset.
The Union Of India & Anr vs Dr. R. B. Singh Gay Homeopathic Medical ... on 13 March, 2018
One has to be
mindful of the fact that the Division Bench in the case of The
Union of India, Ministry of AYUSH and another Vs. Dr.
R.B. Singh Gaya Homeopathic Medical College & Hospital
and others (supra) with its others analogous cases (supra) itself
had recorded, as has been noted hereinabove, that the second
question as to whether the Central Government had the statutory
power to deny permission to an existing Homeopathy College in
the matter of undertaking admission against the sanctioned
strength of seats would arise only if the first question i.e.
Patna High Court CWJC No.18214 of 2018 dt.04-01-2019
19/35
whether the Central Government has got power to carry an
inspection of an existing medical college imparting education in
Homeopathy, was answered in affirmative. The Division
Bench proceeded to answer the second question because it
answered the first question in affirmative.
Section 14 in The Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
B. N. M. Homeopathic Medical College And ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017
There is specific conclusion arrived at in the
Single Judge Bench decision of this Court in the case of B.N.M.
Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others
(supra) that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake
admission vests in the CCH which decision has been restored
Patna High Court CWJC No.18214 of 2018 dt.04-01-2019
18/35
by the Supreme Court in the case of Temple of Hanemann
Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others Vs.
The Union of India and others (supra). The plea that the
Division Bench decision to the extent that such power to deny
or grant permission to undertake admission vests with the
Central Government will hold good, despite the decision having
been set aside by the Supreme Court is a preposterous plea and
is rejected at the threshold.
The Temple Of Hahnemann Homeopathic ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017
The Ministry of AYUSH, on the
one hand appears to be callous in issuing the letter dated
22.11.2018, more than four months after the Supreme Court's
decision in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic
Medical College and Hospital and others (supra) was
rendered and, on the other, the Ministry has issued the letter in
obstinate defiance of the judicial pronouncement. The cryptic
manner, in which the decision has been taken, manifests
recalcitrant conduct of the decision makers.
Dr. R. B. Singh Gaya Homeopathic Medical ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 28 June, 2017
16. The Central Government purportedly, in
compliance of the decision in the case of Dr. R.B. Singh Gaya
Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital supra) has passed
the order on 22.11.2018, denying permission to the Colleges to
undertake admissions. In view of certain facts, which I shall be
dealing with hereinafter, the question of grant or denial or
permission to undertake admission has become academic for the
academic session 2016-17. I, however, note with disgust the
conduct of the Ministry of AYUSH. The denial of permission to
undertake admission has been communicated on 22.11.2018
which is said to have been passed in compliance of this Court's
order dated 28.06.2017. As has been noted above, the said
decision dated 28.06.2017 was subsequently set aside by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.18214 of 2018 dt.04-01-2019
20/35
Division Bench and finally restored by the Supreme Court by a
judgment dated 17.07.2018.