Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)The Census Act, 1948
The Produce Cess Act, 1966
Section 18 in The Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad vs Gyan Devi (Dead) By L.Rs. And Ors on 20 October, 1994
18. In order to appreciate the issues raised in the present review petitions, it will
be necessary to consider that there is distinction between non-joinder of
necessary party who ought to have been joined, and non-joinder of a person
who is joined only as a matter of convenience or expediency. This is because
Order I Rule 9 is rule of procedure which does not affect the substantive law.
It has been held in U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi, (1995) 2
SCC 326 at page 343
Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia vs Additional Member, Board Of Revenue, ... on 19 October, 1962
21. The law is well settled that a necessary party is one without whom
no order can be made effectively and a proper party is one in whose
absence an effective order can be made but whose presence is necessary
for a complete and final decision of the question involved in the
proceeding. (See Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v. Additional Member,
Board of Revenue [1963 Supp (1) SCR 676 : AIR 1963 SC 786] .)
1