Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.34 seconds)Article 1 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Bank Of India vs Rajendra Kumar Singh & Ors on 25 September, 1968
Learned counsel for the appellant has relied upon the
judgment rendered by Hon'ble Apex Court in State Bank of
India Vs. Rajendra Kumar Singh & Ors. reported in AIR
1969 SC 401 (V 56 C79), relevant portion reads as under:-
Muthiah Muthirian vs Vairaperumal Muthirian on 17 July, 1953
On the above findings and observations of the court
below, it is evident that there is a dispute between the
rival parties claiming possession of the deity. This being
so. it is not expected under the provisions of Section 517
of the Code of Criminal Procedure to try this dispute which
is of a civil nature. Their Lordships of the Madras High
Court in their decision reported in Muthiah Muthirian v.
Vairaperumal Muthirian, AIR 1954 Mad 214 in quoting a
passage from Chitaley and Annaji Rao's Criminal
Procedure Code, observed as follows;
Ram Kishan Alias Kishan And Anr. vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 August, 1985
(7 of 10) [CRLA-527/1993]
Learned counsel for the appellant has also relied upon the
judgment rendered by this Hon'ble Court in Ram Kishan Alias
Kishan & Another Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 1985
WLN (UC) 645, relevant portion reads as under:-
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Raj Kishore Mahapatra And Ors. vs Narasingh Mishra on 19 August, 1968
Learned counsel for the appellant has further relied upon
the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Orissa High Court in Raj
Kishore Mahapatra & Ors. Vs. Narasingh Mishra reported in
AIR 1969 Orissa 56 (V 56 C 23), relevant portion reads as
under:-
1