Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.43 seconds)

K.T.S. Sarma, Seshayee Brothers (P) ... vs Subramanian, Prop. Kumar Videos, 14/5, ... on 20 July, 2001

16. The Appellants denied averment of the Respondent No. 1 w.r.t. to cash transactions as loans. The Appellants stated that there is no statutory prohibition against cash loans to the Corporate Debtor. It is the case of the Appellants that while the Income Tax Act imposes penalties for non-compliance with cash transaction limits, it does not invalidate such transactions under the Code. The Appellants cited judgment of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of -10- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 295, 296 & 298 of 2024 K.T.S. Sarma vs. Subramanian, [(2001) 4 CTC 486] that penalties do not nullify contracts.
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next